AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 108 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3311
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3311
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 108 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3311 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 784 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 vs 375
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4327 vs 1082
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12186 vs 5910
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 vs 3341
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 vs 3341
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 784 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 87.81 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 vs 375 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4327 vs 1082 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12186 vs 5910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 vs 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 vs 3341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 375 | 502 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1082 | 4327 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5910 | 12186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 | 3382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 | 3382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3311 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Oland | GK104 |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 693 | 695 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $854.99 | |
| Price now | $446.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 784 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 2,107 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 87.81 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
AMDFirePro S9000
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro M600M
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Pro 455
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX350
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
IntelArc Pro A40
