AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)

NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 771 MHz
Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 784 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 108 Watt
Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5400 MHz
5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 vs 12321
Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55 vs 33.016
Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 970.421 vs 736.063
Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.656 vs 2.73
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 vs 31.588
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 237.944 vs 70.194

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 August 2016 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed	1090 MHz vs 771 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 784 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	70 Watt vs 108 Watt
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz vs 5400 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	65217 vs 12321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	55 vs 33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	970.421 vs 736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.656 vs 2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	76.881 vs 31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	237.944 vs 70.194

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 66.08 GTexel / s
Around 50% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 896
957.7x better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB

Texture fill rate	87.81 GTexel / s vs 66.08 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1344 vs 896
Floating-point performance	2,107 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

65217

12321

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33.016

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

970.421

736.063

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.656

2.73

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

76.881

31.588

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

237.944

70.194

Name	AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)	NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Geekbench - OpenCL	65217	12321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1730	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	55	33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	970.421	736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.656	2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	76.881	31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	237.944	70.194
PassMark - G3D Mark		4334
PassMark - G2D Mark		500
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3311

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)	NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler
Code name	Baffin	GK104
Design	Radeon RX 400 Series
GCN generation	4th Gen
Launch date	8 August 2016	22 July 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	$854.99
Place in performance rating	695	698
Price now	$179.50	$446.99
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	26.72	11.92
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	784 MHz
Compute units	14
Core clock speed	1090 MHz	771 MHz
Floating-point performance	2.2 TFLOPs	2,107 gflops
GPU Power	35-48 Watt
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	896	1344
Stream Processors	896
Texture fill rate	66.08 GTexel / s	87.81 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	70 Watt	108 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bridgeless CrossFire
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Recommended system power (PSU)	400 Watt
Length		241 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	172.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore