NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 2x more core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 771 MHz
  • 2x more boost clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 784 MHz
  • Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 87.81 GTexel / s
  • Around 44% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 2,107 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
  • Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 6373
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 6373
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 6 February 2017 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed 1557 MHz vs 771 MHz
Boost clock speed 1607 MHz vs 784 MHz
Texture fill rate 94.72 GTexel / s vs 87.81 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 3,031 gflops vs 2,107 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
Maximum memory size 5 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8429 vs 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8429 vs 6373

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

  • Around 31% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1024
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 vs 1825
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 vs 1825
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 vs 1680
  • Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 vs 1680
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1344 vs 1024
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3382 vs 1825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3382 vs 1825
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3311 vs 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3311 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8429
6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8429
6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1825
3382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1825
3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1680
3311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1680
3311
Name NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro K4200
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 0
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8429 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8429 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1825 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1825 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1680 3311
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1680 3311
PassMark - G3D Mark 4326
PassMark - G2D Mark 502
Geekbench - OpenCL 12186
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 70.194

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Kepler
Code name GP107 GK104
Launch date 6 February 2017 22 July 2014
Place in performance rating 701 702
Type Workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $854.99
Price now $446.99
Value for money (0-100) 11.92

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1607 MHz 784 MHz
Core clock speed 1557 MHz 771 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,031 gflops 2,107 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024 1344
Texture fill rate 94.72 GTexel / s 87.81 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 108 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 140.2 GB / s 172.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 160 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz 5400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5