NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 771 MHz
- 2x more boost clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 784 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 87.81 GTexel / s
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 2,107 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 6373
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 6373
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 771 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 784 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s vs 87.81 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops vs 2,107 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 108 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 vs 6373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 vs 6373 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- Around 31% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1024
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 vs 1825
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 vs 1825
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 vs 1680
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 vs 1680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 1024 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 vs 1680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 | 6373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 | 6373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 | 3382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 | 3382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 3311 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 3311 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4324 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 503 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12186 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP107 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 701 | 702 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $854.99 | |
| Price now | $446.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz | 784 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | 2,107 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | 87.81 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro D300
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
IntelArc Pro A40
