NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 98% higher texture fill rate: 67.31 GTexel / s vs 34.0 billion / sec
• 3x more pipelines: 1344 vs 448
• Around 48% better floating-point performance: 1,615 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 215 Watt
• 3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
• Around 79% higher memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4825 vs 3873
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 3614
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3317
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4825 vs 3873
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 3614
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3317

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

• 2x more core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 601 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3111 vs 2806
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 409 vs 361
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10916 vs 5107
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.93 vs 24.713
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 980.005 vs 685.1
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.268 vs 2.189
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.309 vs 28.929
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.852 vs 68.712

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2806 3111
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 409
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5107 10916
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.713 27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	685.1 980.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.189 3.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.929 47.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	68.712 97.852
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4825 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4825 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3317

Compare specifications (specs)