NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and NVIDIA GRID K280Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 148.0 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
  • Around 55% better floating-point performance: 3,553 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6082 vs 2840
  • Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 540 vs 371
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1312
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1312
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 22 July 2014 vs 28 June 2013
Texture fill rate 148.0 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2304 vs 1536
Floating-point performance 3,553 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6082 vs 2840
PassMark - G2D Mark 540 vs 371
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3708 vs 1312
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3708 vs 1312

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K280Q

  • Around 12% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 667 MHz
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6555 vs 5946
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3562 vs 3353
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6555 vs 5946
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3562 vs 3353
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 745 MHz vs 667 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6555 vs 5946
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3562 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6555 vs 5946
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3562 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K280Q

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6082
2840
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
540
371
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5946
6555
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3708
1312
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5946
6555
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3708
1312
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3562
Name NVIDIA Quadro K5200 NVIDIA GRID K280Q
PassMark - G3D Mark 6082 2840
PassMark - G2D Mark 540 371
Geekbench - OpenCL 19677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 47.147
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1278.433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 50.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 115.307
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5946 6555
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3708 1312
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5946 6555
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3708 1312
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3562

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 NVIDIA GRID K280Q

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Kepler
Code name GK110B GK104
Launch date 22 July 2014 28 June 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $1,699.74 $1,875
Place in performance rating 541 542
Price now $523.66
Type Workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 14.51

Technical info

Boost clock speed 771 MHz
Core clock speed 667 MHz 745 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,553 gflops 2,289 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2304 1536
Texture fill rate 148.0 GTexel / s 95.36 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 7,080 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.3 GB / s 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5