NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and NVIDIA GRID K280Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 148.0 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- Around 55% better floating-point performance: 3,553 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6092 vs 2840
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 541 vs 371
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1312
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1312
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 28 June 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 148.0 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 3,553 gflops vs 2,289 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6092 vs 2840 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 541 vs 371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 1312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 1312 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K280Q
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6555 vs 5946
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3562 vs 3353
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6555 vs 5946
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3562 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6555 vs 5946 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3562 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6555 vs 5946 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3562 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K280Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | NVIDIA GRID K280Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6092 | 2840 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 541 | 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.147 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1278.433 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.996 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.307 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5946 | 6555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 1312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3562 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5946 | 6555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 1312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3562 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | NVIDIA GRID K280Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK110B | GK104 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,699.74 | $1,875 |
Place in performance rating | 541 | 542 |
Price now | $523.66 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 771 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,553 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 148.0 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |