NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs AMD Radeon HD 6850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and AMD Radeon HD 6850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 127 Watt
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2881 vs 1972
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 13.033
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 1.333
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 32.609
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 3489
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 3489
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 21 October 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 127 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2881 vs 1972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 vs 13.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 vs 1.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 vs 32.609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 vs 3489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 vs 3489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 37.2 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 960 vs 512
- Around 46% better floating-point performance: 1,488.0 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
- 512x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 vs 312
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 946.933 vs 721.18
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.45 vs 137.786
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 37.2 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,488.0 gflops vs 1,017 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 vs 312 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 946.933 vs 721.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.45 vs 137.786 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | AMD Radeon HD 6850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2881 | 1972 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 434 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 | 13.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 | 946.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 | 1.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 | 32.609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 | 139.45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 | 3489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 | 3489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | AMD Radeon HD 6850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Barts |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 21 October 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $200.89 | $179 |
Place in performance rating | 832 | 823 |
Price now | $203.37 | $99.99 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.10 | 28.63 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1072 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 1,488.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 37.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 127 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | AGP | |
Length | 198 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB / 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |