NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and AMD Radeon HD 8790M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 47% better floating-point performance: 1,017 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2835 vs 1306
• Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 vs 4920
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 12.759
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 vs 465.631
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 1.576
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 28.839
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 80.418
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 2181
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2656
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2014
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 2181
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2656
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2014

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M

• 1024x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 307
• Around 60% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1607 vs 1002

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2835 1306
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	307 751
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8849 4920
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.33 12.759
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	721.18 465.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.056 1.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.938 28.839
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	137.786 80.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4196 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 2656
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2014
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4196 2181
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 2656
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2014
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1002 1607

Compare specifications (specs)