NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
5.4x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 215 Watt
3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 27.93
Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 97.852
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 3873
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3614
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3317
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 3873
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3614
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3317

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 26 March 2010
Pipelines	512 vs 448
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 215 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33 vs 27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786 vs 97.852
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 vs 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 vs 3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3317

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 993 MHz
Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 billion / sec vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Around 7% better floating-point performance: 1,088.6 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
640x more maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3116 vs 2849
Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 308
Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10908 vs 8849
Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 980.005 vs 721.18
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.268 vs 3.056
Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.309 vs 42.938

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1215 MHz vs 993 MHz
Texture fill rate	34.0 billion / sec vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,088.6 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
Maximum memory size	1280 MB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3116 vs 2849
PassMark - G2D Mark	412 vs 308
Geekbench - OpenCL	10908 vs 8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	980.005 vs 721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.268 vs 3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	47.309 vs 42.938

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2849

3116

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

308

412

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8849

10908

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.33

27.93

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

721.18

980.005

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.056

3.268

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.938

47.309

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

137.786

97.852

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

3873

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3614

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3317

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

3873

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3614

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3317

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
PassMark - G3D Mark	2849	3116
PassMark - G2D Mark	308	412
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849	10908
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33	27.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18	980.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056	3.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938	47.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786	97.852
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196	3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196	3873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	3614
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3317
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF100
Launch date	18 August 2015	26 March 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89	$349
Place in performance rating	813	810
Price now	$203.37	$522.01
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	16.10	6.87
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz
Core clock speed	993 MHz	1215 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	1,088.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	512	448
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s	34.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	215 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,100 million
CUDA cores		448
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI
Display Port	1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	Two 6-pins
Bus support		16x PCI-E 2.0
Height		4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length		9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
SLI options		2-way3-way
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.2
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB / 4 GB	1280 MB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	133.9 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI
Surround