NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
Around 9% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 914 MHz
Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1000 or 2500 MHz
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2849 vs 2580
Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 217
Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 vs 373.644
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 2.54
Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 39.412
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 4148
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 4148

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed	993 MHz vs 914 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1000 or 2500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2849 vs 2580
PassMark - G2D Mark	308 vs 217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18 vs 373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056 vs 2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938 vs 39.412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 vs 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 vs 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 3715

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
Around 41% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
2048x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9741 vs 8849
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 vs 38.33
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.158 vs 137.786
3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 vs 1002

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 512
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	9741 vs 8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	42.396 vs 38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	139.158 vs 137.786
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3350 vs 1002

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2849

2580

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

308

217

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8849

9741

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.33

42.396

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

721.18

373.644

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.056

2.54

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.938

39.412

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

137.786

139.158

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

4148

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

4148

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1002

3350

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2849	2580
PassMark - G2D Mark	308	217
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849	9741
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33	42.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18	373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056	2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938	39.412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786	139.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196	4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196	4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002	3350

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Code name	GM107	GM107
Launch date	18 August 2015	13 March 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89
Place in performance rating	813	814
Price now	$203.37
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	16.10
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	993 MHz	914 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	1,439 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	640
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s	44.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		1
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support		1
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB / 4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	32 or 80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1000 or 2500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3 or GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
SLI