NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA GeForce 825M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 941 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 1,017 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2852 vs 771
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 236
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 27 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1072 MHz vs 941 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2852 vs 771 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 236 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M
- Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 512x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
- Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 8849
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 vs 8849 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 825M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | NVIDIA GeForce 825M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2852 | 771 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 236 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | 15796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | NVIDIA GeForce 825M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | GK208 |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 27 January 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
Place in performance rating | 811 | 813 |
Price now | $203.37 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.10 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1072 MHz | 941 MHz |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 722.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 30.11 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1300 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB / 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |