NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 67.2 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1,024 vs 512
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
- 2048x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5568 vs 2835
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 409 vs 307
- Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16648 vs 8849
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 82.563 vs 38.33
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1266.506 vs 721.18
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.91 vs 3.056
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 70.779 vs 42.938
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.607 vs 137.786
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7779 vs 4196
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7779 vs 4196
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1,024 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops vs 1,017 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5568 vs 2835 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 409 vs 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16648 vs 8849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 vs 38.33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 vs 721.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.91 vs 3.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.779 vs 42.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.607 vs 137.786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7779 vs 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7779 vs 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2835 | 5568 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 409 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | 16648 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 | 82.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 | 1266.506 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 | 4.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 | 70.779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 | 252.607 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 | 7779 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 | 7779 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | GM204 |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 18 August 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
Place in performance rating | 806 | 498 |
Price now | $203.37 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.10 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1072 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 2,150 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1,024 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 67.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB / 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |