NVIDIA Quadro M1000M versus NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

versus

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 75 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt versus 75 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1050 MHz versus 993 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 67.2 GTexel / s versus 31.78 GTexel / s
2x plus de pipelines: 1,024 versus 512
2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,150 gflops versus 1,017 gflops
2048x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB
Environ 96% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5568 versus 2835
Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 409 versus 307
Environ 88% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16648 versus 8849
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 82.563 versus 38.33
Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1266.506 versus 721.18
Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.91 versus 3.056
Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 70.779 versus 42.938
Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.607 versus 137.786
Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7779 versus 4196
Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7779 versus 4196

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1050 MHz versus 993 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	67.2 GTexel / s versus 31.78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1,024 versus 512
Performance á point flottant	2,150 gflops versus 1,017 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	4 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	5568 versus 2835
PassMark - G2D Mark	409 versus 307
Geekbench - OpenCL	16648 versus 8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	82.563 versus 38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1266.506 versus 721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.91 versus 3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	70.779 versus 42.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	252.607 versus 137.786
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7779 versus 4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 versus 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 versus 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7779 versus 4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 versus 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 versus 3358

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2835

5568

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

307

409

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8849

16648

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.33

82.563

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

721.18

1266.506

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.056

4.91

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.938

70.779

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

137.786

252.607

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

7779

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3360

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

7779

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3360

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2835	5568
PassMark - G2D Mark	307	409
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849	16648
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33	82.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18	1266.506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056	4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938	70.779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786	252.607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196	7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196	7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Nom de code	GM107	GM204
Date de sortie	18 August 2015	18 August 2015
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$200.89
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	806	498
Prix maintenant	$203.37
Genre	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	16.10
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1072 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	993 MHz	1050 MHz
Performance á point flottant	1,017 gflops	2,150 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	1,024
Taux de remplissage de la texture	31.78 GTexel / s	67.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	75 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,870 million	5,200 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	1.2
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Taille du laptop	large	large
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	None
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.0	5.0
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB / 4 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	80 GB / s	160 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	256 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	5012 MHz	5012 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus