NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 796 MHz
Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1163 MHz
Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
Around 3% better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 1,812 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6612 MHz
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5034 vs 3985
Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17485 vs 14562
Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 55.048
Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 639.056
Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 3.697
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 5523
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3325
Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 5523
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3325

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	25 October 2016 vs 8 April 2016
Core clock speed	1290 MHz vs 796 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz vs 1163 MHz
Texture fill rate	58.2 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,862 gflops vs 1,812 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 6612 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5034 vs 3985
Geekbench - OpenCL	17485 vs 14562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	67.209 vs 55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	799.414 vs 639.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.536 vs 3.697
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7043 vs 5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7043 vs 5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 561 vs 461
Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.796 vs 30.523
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 225.868 vs 223.683

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	561 vs 461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	35.796 vs 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	225.868 vs 223.683

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5034

3985

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

461

561

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

17485

14562

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

67.209

55.048

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

799.414

639.056

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.536

3.697

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.523

35.796

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

223.683

225.868

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7043

5523

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3325

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7043

5523

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3325

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)	NVIDIA Quadro M2000
PassMark - G3D Mark	5034	3985
PassMark - G2D Mark	461	561
Geekbench - OpenCL	17485	14562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	67.209	55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	799.414	639.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.536	3.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.523	35.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	223.683	225.868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7043	5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7043	5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3325
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1798

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)	NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GP107	GM206
Launch date	25 October 2016	8 April 2016
Launch price (MSRP)	$109	$437.75
Place in performance rating	590	591
Price now	$124.99	$409.99
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	56.95	13.23
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	1163 MHz
Core clock speed	1290 MHz	796 MHz
CUDA cores	640
Floating-point performance	1,862 gflops	1,812 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C
Pipelines	640	768
Texture fill rate	58.2 GTexel / s	56.64 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	2,940 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Height	4.38" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	201 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	300 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	2-slot	1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GameStream
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
VR Ready
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management