NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 254 Watt
- Around 19% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4200 MHz
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3461 vs 2534
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8148 vs 3977
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 0.789
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 December 2015 vs 19 September 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 254 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3461 vs 2534 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 vs 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 vs 0.789 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
- 5.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 43.92 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 2x 960 vs 640
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 373 vs 340
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 43.92 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 960 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 1,405 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 373 vs 340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3461 | 2534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 373 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 | 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 | 0.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 172.896 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Barts |
Launch date | 3 December 2015 | 19 September 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 719 | 721 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1098 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 2x 1,536.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 2x 960 |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 254 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 2x 134.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |