NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 5 March 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 80 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 2,560 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 592 vs 381
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4636 vs 4262
- 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77430 vs 16429
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6821 vs 6337
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6821 vs 6337
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 80 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,560 gflops vs 2,099 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 vs 381 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4636 vs 4262 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77430 vs 16429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 vs 6337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6821 vs 6337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3715 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 381 | 592 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4262 | 4636 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16429 | 77430 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 | 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 | 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.446 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 952.668 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.68 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.456 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 294.215 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1651 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM206 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 5 March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 476 | 477 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1025 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops | 2,560 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
| Texture fill rate | 65.6 GTexel / s | 80 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 2,800 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3670
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4700 X2
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX550
