NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1025 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 65.6 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- Around 66% better floating-point performance: 2,099 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 37% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 4008 MHz
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6337 vs 3362
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6337 vs 3362
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 8 March 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1025 MHz vs 823 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 65.6 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 4008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 vs 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 vs 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3352 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6895 vs 3715
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6895 vs 3715
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6895 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6895 vs 3715 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 381 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4262 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16429 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 6895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 6895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3352 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GM206 | GF114 |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 8 March 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 476 | 478 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1025 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops | 1,263.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 65.6 GTexel / s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 128.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3670
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4700 X2
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX550
