NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1025 MHz vs 600 MHz
4x more pipelines: 1024 vs 2x 128
2.7x better floating-point performance: 2,099 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
4.1x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 226 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB
3.4x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4262 vs 676

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 18 April 2008
Core clock speed	1025 MHz vs 600 MHz
Pipelines	1024 vs 2x 128
Floating-point performance	2,099 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 226 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2x 1 GB
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4262 vs 676

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

3.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 65.6 GTexel / s
Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 381
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4196 vs 3358
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4196 vs 3358

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 65.6 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	509 vs 381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4196 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4196 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

381

509

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4262

676

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

4196

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

4196

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
PassMark - G2D Mark	381	509
PassMark - G3D Mark	4262	676
Geekbench - OpenCL	16429
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	4196

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Tesla
Code name	GM206	G92
Launch date	11 January 2017	18 April 2008
Place in performance rating	476	473
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,999
Technical info
Core clock speed	1025 MHz	600 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,099 gflops	2x 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	1024	2x 128
Texture fill rate	65.6 GTexel / s	2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	226 Watt
Transistor count	2,940 million	754 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2x 1 GB
Memory bandwidth	88 GB / s	2x 51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3