NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1025 MHz vs 667 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 65.6 GTexel / s vs 32.02 GTexel / s
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 576
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 2,099 gflops vs 768.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 83% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 3008 MHz
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 vs 287
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4284 vs 1363
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16429 vs 4566
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6337 vs 2294
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6337 vs 2294
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3605
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3605
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1025 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 65.6 GTexel / s vs 32.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 576 |
Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops vs 768.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 3008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 vs 287 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4284 vs 1363 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16429 vs 4566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 vs 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 vs 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3605 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 287 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4284 | 1363 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16429 | 4566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.892 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.761 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.703 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM206 | GK106 |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 473 | 1101 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $84.95 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1025 MHz | 667 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 576 |
Texture fill rate | 65.6 GTexel / s | 32.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 48.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 3008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |