NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 54% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1025 MHz versus 667 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 65.6 GTexel / s versus 32.02 GTexel / s
- Environ 78% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 576
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,099 gflops versus 768.4 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 83% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 3008 MHz
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 versus 287
- 3.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4284 versus 1363
- 3.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16429 versus 4566
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6337 versus 2294
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6337 versus 2294
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3605
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3605
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 January 2017 versus 23 July 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1025 MHz versus 667 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 65.6 GTexel / s versus 32.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 576 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,099 gflops versus 768.4 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz versus 3008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 versus 287 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4284 versus 1363 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16429 versus 4566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 versus 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 versus 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3605 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 287 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4284 | 1363 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16429 | 4566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 | 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.892 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.761 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.703 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM206 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 11 January 2017 | 23 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 473 | 1101 |
Genre | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $84.95 | |
Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1025 MHz | 667 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,099 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 576 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 65.6 GTexel / s | 32.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 55 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,940 million | 2,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 88 GB / s | 48.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz | 3008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |