NVIDIA Quadro M4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 773 MHz versus 667 MHz
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6675 versus 6103
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 669 versus 548
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.548 versus 47.147
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.453 versus 3.996
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.357 versus 115.307
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6291 versus 5946
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6291 versus 5946
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2015 versus 22 July 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 773 MHz versus 667 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6675 versus 6103 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 versus 548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 versus 47.147 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 versus 3.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 versus 115.307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 versus 5946 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 versus 5946 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5200
- Environ 84% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 148.0 GTexel / s versus 80.39 GTexel / s
- Environ 38% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1664
- Environ 38% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,553 gflops versus 2,573 gflops
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19232 versus 18372
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1278.433 versus 732.046
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 50.08 versus 17.725
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3685
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3332
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3685
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3332
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 148.0 GTexel / s versus 80.39 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 1664 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,553 gflops versus 2,573 gflops |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19232 versus 18372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1278.433 versus 732.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.08 versus 17.725 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3332 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6675 | 6103 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 | 548 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | 19232 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | 47.147 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | 1278.433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | 3.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | 50.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | 115.307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | 5946 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | 5946 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 689 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM204 | GK110B |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $791 | $1,699.74 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 537 | 540 |
Prix maintenant | $765.93 | $523.66 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.68 | 14.51 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 773 MHz | 667 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,573 gflops | 3,553 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1664 | 2304 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.39 GTexel / s | 148.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 7,080 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 771 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |