NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 551
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 551 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 773 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 216.5 GTexel / s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
- Around 73% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 1664
- 2x better floating-point performance: 5,196 gflops vs 2,573 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8096 vs 6680
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24013 vs 18372
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.178 vs 65.548
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1816.61 vs 732.046
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.435 vs 5.453
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.889 vs 17.725
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 355.166 vs 217.357
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 6291
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3332
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 6291
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3332
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 773 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 216.5 GTexel / s vs 80.39 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1664 |
Floating-point performance | 5,196 gflops vs 2,573 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8096 vs 6680 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24013 vs 18372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.178 vs 65.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1816.61 vs 732.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.435 vs 5.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.889 vs 17.725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 355.166 vs 217.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 vs 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 vs 6291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | 8096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | 24013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | 1816.61 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | 88.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | 355.166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM204 | GK110B |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | $5,265 |
Place in performance rating | 534 | 364 |
Price now | $765.93 | $833.98 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | 11.34 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 773 MHz | 797 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops | 5,196 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1664 | 2880 |
Texture fill rate | 80.39 GTexel / s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 7,080 million |
Boost clock speed | 902 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |