NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 80.39 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 4.3x more pipelines: 1664 vs 384
- 3x better floating-point performance: 2,573 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 2220
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 480
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 vs 6869
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.548 vs 22.112
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 732.046 vs 297.631
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.453 vs 1.427
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.725 vs 15.363
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.357 vs 99.125
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6291 vs 2970
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 2490
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6291 vs 2970
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 2490
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 vs 22 July 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 80.39 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1664 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 vs 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 vs 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 vs 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 vs 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 vs 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 vs 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 vs 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 vs 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 vs 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 3329 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 773 MHz
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 702 vs 680
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 773 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 vs 680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GM204 | GM107 |
Launch date | 29 June 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | $189.89 |
Place in performance rating | 534 | 953 |
Price now | $765.93 | $189.93 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | 15.23 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 773 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1664 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 80.39 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 41 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,870 million |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | 4 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 160 mm |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | 1" (2.5 cm) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |