NVIDIA Quadro M4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 80.39 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
- 4.3x plus de pipelines: 1664 versus 384
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,573 gflops versus 863.2 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 versus 2220
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 versus 480
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 versus 6869
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.548 versus 22.112
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 732.046 versus 297.631
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.453 versus 1.427
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.725 versus 15.363
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.357 versus 99.125
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6291 versus 2970
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 2490
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6291 versus 2970
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 2490
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2015 versus 22 July 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.39 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1664 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,573 gflops versus 863.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 versus 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 versus 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 versus 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 versus 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 versus 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 versus 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 versus 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 versus 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 versus 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 versus 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3329 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 773 MHz
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 702 versus 680
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 773 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 versus 680 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18372 | 6869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | 22.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | 297.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | 1.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | 15.363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | 99.125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | 2970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 2490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 | 702 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GM204 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 29 June 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $791 | $189.89 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 534 | 953 |
Prix maintenant | $765.93 | $189.93 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.68 | 15.23 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 773 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,573 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1664 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.39 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 41 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 1,870 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | 4 |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 160 mm |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | None |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | 1" (2.5 cm) |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |