NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs ATI FireGL V8650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and ATI FireGL V8650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 688 MHz
- 7.1x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1,280 vs 320
- 5.7x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 440.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1736 MHz
- 11.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6146 vs 550
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 14 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz vs 688 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1,280 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 440.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1736 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6146 vs 550 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V8650
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 413
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3093
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3093
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 vs 413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3093 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V8650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | ATI FireGL V8650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6146 | 550 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | 637 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19918 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.338 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.443 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.464 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2749 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3093 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2749 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3093 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | ATI FireGL V8650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM204 | R600 |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 14 May 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 551 | 434 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,799 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1013 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 688 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 440.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 1,280 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 11.01 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 254 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 111.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1736 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
