NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs ATI Radeon 9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M500M and ATI Radeon 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 9x more texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 195.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1171 vs 6
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 181 vs 163
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 April 2016 vs 1 April 2003 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 250 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 64 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1171 vs 6 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 vs 163 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9100
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 30 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M500M | ATI Radeon 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1171 | 6 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | 163 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6099 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1729 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1729 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3122 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M500M | ATI Radeon 9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Rage 7 |
| Code name | GM108 | R200 |
| Launch date | 27 April 2016 | 1 April 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | 1084 | 1081 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Transistor count | 60 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | AGP 4x |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.4 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||

