NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 947 MHz
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 5.6x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11804 vs 8729
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11804 vs 8729
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3353
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X

• Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 176.0 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
• Around 38% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2048
• Around 32% better floating-point performance: 5,632 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 770 vs 698
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8644 vs 7915
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 vs 3684
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 vs 3684

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	698 770
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7915 8644
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11804 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11804 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3684 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3684 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4193 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4193 3353

Compare specifications (specs)