AMD Radeon RX Vega vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 307.2 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 9,830 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12297 vs 7915
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 vs 698
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 vs 4193
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 vs 4193
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2017 vs 8 April 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 861 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 307.2 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 9,830 gflops vs 4,252 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12297 vs 7915 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 vs 698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 vs 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 vs 4193 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 5.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11804 vs 2094
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 2391
- 5.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11804 vs 2094
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 2391
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11804 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11804 vs 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 2391 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12297 | 7915 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 | 698 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67957 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3986.188 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.975 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.468 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1291.445 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2094 | 11804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2391 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2094 | 11804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2391 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 | 4193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.3 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Greenland | GM204 |
Launch date | 1 April 2017 | 8 April 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 253 | 250 |
Price now | $409.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 861 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 9,830 gflops | 4,252 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 307.2 GTexel / s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB / s | 224.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 7012 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |