NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3356
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 April 2016 vs 21 March 2015 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 988 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 213.9 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- Around 61% better floating-point performance: 6,844 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 723 vs 698
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11758 vs 7915
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13738 vs 11804
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13738 vs 11804
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3684
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3684
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 988 MHz vs 861 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 213.9 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops vs 4,252 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 vs 698 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11758 vs 7915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13738 vs 11804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13738 vs 11804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3684 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | 723 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7915 | 11758 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11804 | 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11804 | 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 | 3356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39571 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2593.621 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.895 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.003 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 768.171 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GM204 | GM200 |
Launch date | 8 April 2016 | 21 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 252 | 250 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,199.99 | |
Price now | $2,825 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.69 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 861 MHz | 988 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops | 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 3072 |
Texture fill rate | 132.9 GTexel / s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 8,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.4 GB / s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |