NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 6612 MHz
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3356
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3356
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 April 2016 vs 21 March 2015
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 7012 MHz vs 6612 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 4193 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 4193 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000

  • Around 15% higher core clock speed: 988 MHz vs 861 MHz
  • Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1038 MHz
  • Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 213.9 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
  • Around 61% better floating-point performance: 6,844 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 737 vs 698
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11792 vs 7915
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13738 vs 11804
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13738 vs 11804
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3684
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3684
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 988 MHz vs 861 MHz
Boost clock speed 1114 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Texture fill rate 213.9 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3072 vs 2048
Floating-point performance 6,844 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 737 vs 698
PassMark - G3D Mark 11792 vs 7915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13738 vs 11804
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13738 vs 11804
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3684

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
698
737
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7915
11792
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11804
13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11804
13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3684
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3684
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4193
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4193
3356
Name NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro M6000
PassMark - G2D Mark 698 737
PassMark - G3D Mark 7915 11792
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11804 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11804 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3684 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3684 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 4193 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 4193 3356
Geekbench - OpenCL 37354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 207.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2593.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 145.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 768.171

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 Maxwell 2.0
Code name GM204 GM200
Launch date 8 April 2016 21 March 2015
Place in performance rating 241 242
Type Workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $4,199.99
Price now $2,825
Value for money (0-100) 4.69

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1038 MHz 1114 MHz
Core clock speed 861 MHz 988 MHz
Floating-point performance 4,252 gflops 6,844 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2048 3072
Texture fill rate 132.9 GTexel / s 213.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million 8,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 224.4 GB / s 317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 7012 MHz 6612 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5