NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M600M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 738 MHz
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 11.81 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 384 vs 32
- 7.3x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 117.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1008 MHz
- 13.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2151 vs 160
- 6.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 vs 52
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1731
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1731
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 10 March 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 738 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s vs 11.81 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 117.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2151 vs 160 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 vs 52 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1731 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 vs 3681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 vs 3681 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M600M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2151 | 160 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 52 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5927 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2945 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2945 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 179.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1813.265 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.817 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.948 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 757.451 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M600M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla |
| Code name | GM107 | G96C |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 10 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 681 | 684 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 738 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 117.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 11.81 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 16.13 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M600M with others
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
ATIFireGL V5100
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 120 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
IntelHD Graphics 2000
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
IntelHD Graphics P4600
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro M600M vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
