NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2500 MHz
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 391 vs 245
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 January 2017 vs 13 March 2015
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 391 vs 245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3714

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

  • Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 756 MHz
  • Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 977 MHz
  • Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 47.04 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
  • Around 51% better floating-point performance: 1,505 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3366 vs 2775
  • Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10985 vs 8073
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 vs 3854
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 vs 3854
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1096 MHz vs 756 MHz
Boost clock speed 1176 MHz vs 977 MHz
Texture fill rate 47.04 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 512
Floating-point performance 1,505 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3366 vs 2775
Geekbench - OpenCL 10985 vs 8073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5264 vs 3854
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5264 vs 3854

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
391
245
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2775
3366
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8073
10985
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3854
5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3854
5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3358
Name NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
PassMark - G2D Mark 391 245
PassMark - G3D Mark 2775 3366
Geekbench - OpenCL 8073 10985
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3854 5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3854 5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 54.294
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 795.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 51.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 174.513
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1231

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Maxwell
Code name GM107 GM107
Launch date 11 January 2017 13 March 2015
Place in performance rating 584 735
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 977 MHz 1176 MHz
Core clock speed 756 MHz 1096 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,000 gflops 1,505 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 512 640
Texture fill rate 31.26 GTexel / s 47.04 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 1,870 million
CUDA cores 640

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support 1
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support 1

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) MXM-B (3.0)
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.19 GB / s 80 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 2500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI