NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 391 vs 336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 3 December 2015 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 vs 336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 756 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1098 MHz vs 977 MHz
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 1,000 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3446 vs 2775
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8148 vs 8073
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 3854
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 3854
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 756 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1098 MHz vs 977 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s vs 31.26 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops vs 1,000 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3446 vs 2775 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 vs 8073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 vs 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 vs 3854 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 | 336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2775 | 3446 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8073 | 8148 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3854 | 4920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3854 | 4920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 172.896 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM107 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 3 December 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 584 | 700 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 977 MHz | 1098 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 756 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 31.26 GTexel / s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 350
