NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 580 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 4.64 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1188 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 141 vs 50
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 784 vs 392
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 784 vs 392
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 August 2008 vs 9 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 580 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 4.64 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1188 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 141 vs 50 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 784 vs 392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 784 vs 392 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
- 2x more pipelines: 16 vs 8
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 25.6 gflops vs 23.2 gflops
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 12 Watt
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 45 vs 27
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 16 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops vs 23.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 12 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 45 vs 27 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 141 | 50 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 27 | 45 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 784 | 392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 784 | 392 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G98 | G86 |
| Launch date | 15 August 2008 | 9 May 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1679 | 1681 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 580 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 23.2 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 8 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.64 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 210 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-I | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 9.5 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1188 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR3, GDDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
| nView | ||
