NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 43 vs 27
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 May 2009 vs 15 August 2008 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 vs 27 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 580 MHz vs 540 MHz
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 4.64 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 23.2 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 23 Watt
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1390 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 141 vs 111
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 784 vs 494
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 784 vs 494
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 580 MHz vs 540 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 4.64 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 23.2 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 23 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1390 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 141 vs 111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 784 vs 494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 784 vs 494 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 111 | 141 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 | 27 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 494 | 784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 494 | 784 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
| Code name | G98 | G98 |
| Launch date | 7 May 2009 | 15 August 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54.50 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1676 | 1679 |
| Price now | $49.75 | |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.51 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 540 MHz | 580 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 20.8 gflops | 23.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 8 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.32 GTexel / s | 4.64 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 12 Watt |
| Transistor count | 210 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-I |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 11.12 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1390 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
