NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 89 vs 42
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 November 2008 vs 14 August 2008 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 89 vs 42 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 480 MHz
- Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 43.2 GTexel / s vs 2x 3.84 GTexel / s billion / sec
- 8x more pipelines: 128 vs 2x 8
- 11x better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 2x 19.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 2x 256 MB
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 575 vs 67
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 GTexel / s vs 2x 3.84 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 128 vs 2x 8 |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops vs 2x 19.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 2x 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 575 vs 67 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 67 | 575 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 89 | 42 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3272 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3272 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G98 | G92 |
Launch date | 11 November 2008 | 14 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $163.14 | |
Place in performance rating | 1421 | 1422 |
Price now | $168 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 480 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 19.2 gflops | 422.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 8 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 3.84 GTexel / s billion / sec | 43.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 256 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 11.2 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |