NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 719 MHz
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 14.38 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 552.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4454 vs 743
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 1436
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 1711
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 1436
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 1711
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 1 July 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 719 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 14.38 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 552.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4454 vs 743 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 1711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 1711 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 47 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 714 vs 602
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 714 vs 602 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4454 | 743 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 602 | 714 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 1711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 1711 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | GK208 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 1 July 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | |
| Place in performance rating | 523 | 518 |
| Price now | $319.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 719 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 552.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 14.38 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDFirePro M6000
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
