NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 285
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 918 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4096 MB vs 2 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3043
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3043
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6135 vs 2782
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6135 vs 2782
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7710 vs 6474
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7710 vs 6474
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 July 2017 vs 2 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 918 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4096 MB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6135 vs 2782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6135 vs 2782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7710 vs 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7710 vs 6474 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 768 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19434 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6135 | 2782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6135 | 2782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7710 | 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7710 | 6474 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.799 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.632 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.369 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.954 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 391.399 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2778 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 285 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GP107GL | Tonga |
| Launch date | 5 July 2017 | 2 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 461 | 464 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 918 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1792 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,290 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 102.8 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4096 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 176.0 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Technologies |
||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V7200
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V5200
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R7 A265
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 285
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000M
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470X
