NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 M395X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 723 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2154
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2154
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6135 vs 3354
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6135 vs 3354
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7710 vs 7365
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7710 vs 7365
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 July 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 723 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2154 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2154 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6135 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6135 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7710 vs 7365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7710 vs 7365 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27707 vs 19093
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27707 vs 19093 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M395X
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19093 | 27707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2154 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2154 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6135 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6135 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7710 | 7365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7710 | 7365 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5195 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 733 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.367 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.421 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.718 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.057 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 413.329 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 M395X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GP107GL | Amethyst |
| Launch date | 5 July 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 453 | 454 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4096 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R7 A265
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980M
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 M395X
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
IntelUHD Graphics P750
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX550
