NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
2.1x more core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 730 MHz
2.1x more boost clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 780 MHz
5.1x more texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
5.1x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
3.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz

Launch date	6 February 2017 vs 30 June 2016
Core clock speed	1557 MHz vs 730 MHz
Boost clock speed	1607 MHz vs 780 MHz
Texture fill rate	94.72 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 384
Floating-point performance	3,031 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3341 vs 1825
Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3341 vs 1825
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1680
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1680

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3341 vs 1825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3341 vs 1825
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1825

3341

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1825

3341

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1680

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1680

3355

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8429
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8429
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1825	3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1825	3341
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1680	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1680	3355
PassMark - G2D Mark		370
PassMark - G3D Mark		1076
Geekbench - OpenCL		5903

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Code name	GP107	Oland
Launch date	6 February 2017	30 June 2016
Place in performance rating	702	703
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1607 MHz	780 MHz
Core clock speed	1557 MHz	730 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,031 gflops	599.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	384
Texture fill rate	94.72 GTexel / s	18.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	1,040 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	140.2 GB / s	28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	160 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3