NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 706 MHz
  • Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 90.37 GTexel / s
  • Around 40% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 2,169 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 122 Watt
  • Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 6288
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 6288
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 6 February 2017 vs 17 August 2012
Core clock speed 1557 MHz vs 706 MHz
Texture fill rate 94.72 GTexel / s vs 90.37 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 3,031 gflops vs 2,169 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 122 Watt
Maximum memory size 5 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8429 vs 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8429 vs 6288

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000

  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 vs 1825
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 vs 1825
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1680
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1680
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1536 vs 1024
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3680 vs 1825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3680 vs 1825
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8429
6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8429
6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1825
3680
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1825
3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1680
3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1680
3352
Name NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro K5000
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 1351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8429 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8429 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1825 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1825 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1680 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1680 3352
PassMark - G3D Mark 3992
PassMark - G2D Mark 432
Geekbench - OpenCL 11459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 681.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 32.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 67.311

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro K5000

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Kepler
Code name GP107 GK104
Launch date 6 February 2017 17 August 2012
Place in performance rating 703 706
Type Workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $2,499
Price now $1,950
Value for money (0-100) 2.47

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1607 MHz
Core clock speed 1557 MHz 706 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,031 gflops 2,169 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024 1536
Texture fill rate 94.72 GTexel / s 90.37 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 122 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 140.2 GB / s 172.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 160 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz 5400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5