NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 90.37 GTexel / s
- Around 40% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 2,169 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 6288
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 6288
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 17 August 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 706 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s vs 90.37 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops vs 2,169 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 vs 6288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 vs 6288 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 vs 1825
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 vs 1825
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1680
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1024 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 1680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 | 6288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 | 6288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3987 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11376 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.318 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 681.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.922 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.311 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP107 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 17 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 696 | 697 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
| Price now | $1,950 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.47 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | 2,169 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | 90.37 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X700
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6150
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 140 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro 7000
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
