NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
Around 14% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 896
Around 54% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 1 GB
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1825 vs 971
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1825 vs 971

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	6 February 2017 vs 21 December 2013
Core clock speed	1557 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Texture fill rate	94.72 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 896
Floating-point performance	3,031 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 85 Watt
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1825 vs 971
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1825 vs 971

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1980 vs 1680
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1980 vs 1680

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	6500 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1980 vs 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1980 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1825

971

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1825

971

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1680

1980

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1680

1980

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8429
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8429
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1825	971
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1825	971
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1680	1980
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1680	1980
PassMark - G2D Mark		508
PassMark - G3D Mark		3048

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 2.0
Code name	GP107	Bonaire
Launch date	6 February 2017	21 December 2013
Place in performance rating	672	675
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1607 MHz
Core clock speed	1557 MHz	1100 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,031 gflops	1,971 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	896
Texture fill rate	94.72 GTexel / s	61.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	85 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	2,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		183 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	140.2 GB / s	104.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	160 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	6500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5