NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1085 MHz
2.2x more texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
2.2x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
1201.6x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 4843
Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 4843

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	6 February 2017 vs 18 February 2014
Core clock speed	1557 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	1607 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate	94.72 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 640
Floating-point performance	3,031 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8429 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8429 vs 4843

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1825
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1825
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1680
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1680

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 1825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 1825
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 vs 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8429

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8429

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1825

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1825

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1680

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1680

3329

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8429	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8429	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1825	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1825	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1680	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1680	3329
PassMark - G3D Mark		3897
PassMark - G2D Mark		518
Geekbench - OpenCL		11515
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		133.458

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Code name	GP107	GM107
Launch date	6 February 2017	18 February 2014
Place in performance rating	703	725
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Price now		$299.01
Value for money (0-100)		15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1607 MHz	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	1557 MHz	1020 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,031 gflops	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	640
Texture fill rate	94.72 GTexel / s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	140.2 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	160 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA