NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 74% higher boost clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 67% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 4396
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 4396
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 8 January 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 vs 4396 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 vs 4396 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 103.6 GTexel / s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 3,315 gflops vs 3,031 gflops
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1825
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1825
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 1680
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 1680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 103.6 GTexel / s vs 94.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 1024 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,315 gflops vs 3,031 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 1680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 | 4396 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 | 4396 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 3348 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2806 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 372 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13798 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.311 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.334 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.328 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.205 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.508 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 8 January 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 704 | 707 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | 3,315 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1792 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | 103.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | 240.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5100
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5200
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8950 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550D IGP
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
