NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
• Around 67% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5616 MHz
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6957 vs 2721
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 424
• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22896 vs 6674
• 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 18.462
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 427.88
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.736 vs 1.899
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 23.742
• 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 417.823 vs 61.965
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 3798
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 3651
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 3798
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 3651
• 3.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2958 vs 817

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6957 2721
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 424
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22896 6674
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	113.416 18.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1414.794 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.736 1.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.206 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	417.823 61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3321
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 817

Compare specifications (specs)