NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 960 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 540
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 June 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 960 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 vs 540 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11353 vs 9372
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17150 vs 11437
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1676
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17150 vs 11437
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1676
- Around 73% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5888 vs 3404
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1920 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11353 vs 9372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 vs 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 vs 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1676 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5888 vs 3404 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 | 11353 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 | 540 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 | 5888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Code name | GP106 | TU106B |
| Launch date | 10 June 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 307 | 197 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4400 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 201 mm (7.9") | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 200.2 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 160 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2200 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 380X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAP102-100
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500 XT
