NVIDIA Quadro P3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1088 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 148 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 1001.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3698
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3340
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3698
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3340
- 9.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3489 vs 376
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 19 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1088 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 148 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3489 vs 376 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Around 30% higher pipelines: 1664 vs 1280
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9636 vs 6449
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 415
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28518 vs 25811
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 9579
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 9579
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1664 vs 1280 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9636 vs 6449 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 415 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28518 vs 25811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 9579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 9579 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6449 | 9636 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25811 | 28518 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9579 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9579 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3489 | 376 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.76 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 489.884 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N17E-Q1 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 19 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 379 | 376 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Price now | $407.76 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1088 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1664 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 148 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 1664 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168 GB / s | 224 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P3000 vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
NVIDIAQuadro P3000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
NVIDIAQuadro P3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIAQuadro P3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
NVIDIAQuadro P3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
NVIDIAQuadro P3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
