NVIDIA Quadro P3000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3000 and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro P3000

NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1088 MHz vs 706 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5200 MHz
Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6636 vs 4432
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 210
Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25146 vs 14510
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9579 vs 8319
Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9579 vs 8319

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 5 January 2013
Core clock speed	1088 MHz vs 706 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 5 GB
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 5200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6636 vs 4432
PassMark - G2D Mark	444 vs 210
Geekbench - OpenCL	25146 vs 14510
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9579 vs 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9579 vs 8319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Around 95% higher pipelines: 2496 vs 1280
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3720
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3360
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3720
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3360

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2496 vs 1280
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7337 vs 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	10873 vs 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7337 vs 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	10873 vs 3360

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6636

4432

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

444

210

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

25146

14510

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9579

8319

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

7337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

10873

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9579

8319

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

7337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

10873

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P3000	NVIDIA Tesla K20m
PassMark - G3D Mark	6636	4432
PassMark - G2D Mark	444	210
Geekbench - OpenCL	25146	14510
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9579	8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720	7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	10873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9579	8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720	7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	10873
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3489
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		250.291

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P3000	NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Code name	N17E-Q1	GK110
Launch date	11 January 2017	5 January 2013
Place in performance rating	382	408
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$3,199
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz
Core clock speed	1088 MHz	706 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1280	2496
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	225 Watt
Floating-point performance		3,524 gflops
Texture fill rate		146.8 GTexel / s
Transistor count		7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Port	1.4
Display Connectors		No outputs
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	168 GB / s	208.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	5200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Stereo
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView
nView Display Management
Optimus
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface		PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin