NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1152
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32521 vs 31426
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 10566
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3697
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3338
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 10566
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3697
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3338

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1328 MHz
• Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1476 MHz
• Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 123.0 GTexel / s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
• Around 27% better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 3,098 gflops
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7012 MHz
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9759 vs 8920
• Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 777 vs 457

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8920 9759
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	457 777
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32521 31426
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12948 10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12948 10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3338

Compare specifications (specs)