NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 1075 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
1001.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 9834
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 9834

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 February 2018 vs 17 March 2015
Core clock speed	1328 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1476 MHz vs 1075 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12948 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12948 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Around 98% higher texture fill rate: 192 billion / sec vs 96.8 GTexel / s
2.4x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1280
2.2x better floating-point performance: 6,691 gflops vs 3,098 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12748 vs 8734
Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 454
Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41155 vs 34303

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	192 billion / sec vs 96.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3072 vs 1280
Floating-point performance	6,691 gflops vs 3,098 gflops
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	12748 vs 8734
PassMark - G2D Mark	828 vs 454
Geekbench - OpenCL	41155 vs 34303

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8734

12748

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

454

828

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

34303

41155

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12948

9834

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3343

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12948

9834

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3343

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
PassMark - G3D Mark	8734	12748
PassMark - G2D Mark	454	828
Geekbench - OpenCL	34303	41155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12948	9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12948	9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	1231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		518.554

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GP104	GM200
Launch date	21 February 2018	17 March 2015
Place in performance rating	335	332
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$1,999.99
Value for money (0-100)		7.38
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1476 MHz	1075 MHz
Core clock speed	1328 MHz	1000 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,098 gflops	6,691 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1280	3072
Texture fill rate	96.8 GTexel / s	192 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	7,200 million	8,000 million
CUDA cores		3072
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		600 Watt
SLI options		4x
Supplementary power connectors		6-pin + 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	168.3 GB / s	336.5 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost