NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 525 MHz
- 10.1x more texture fill rate: 21.25 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 256 vs 40
- 16.2x better floating-point performance: 679.9 gflops vs 42 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 14.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1651 vs 114
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 435 vs 346
- 7.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 426
- 7.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 426
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 28 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 525 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops vs 42 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1651 vs 114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 vs 346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 vs 426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 vs 426 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 30 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1651 | 114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 | 346 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.856 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.38 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.011 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.489 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 426 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P400 | ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
Code name | GP107 | RV610 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 28 June 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 983 | 980 |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 525 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 42 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 2.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |