NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 840A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA GeForce 840A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 21.25 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 2002 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1649 vs 1123
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 436 vs 221
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 2188
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 2314
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 3117
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 2188
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 2314
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 3117
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 17 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 2002 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1649 vs 1123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 436 vs 221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 vs 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 vs 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 vs 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 vs 3117 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840A
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
- Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5596 vs 3053
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 679.9 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5596 vs 3053 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA GeForce 840A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1649 | 1123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 436 | 221 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 | 5596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.856 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.38 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.011 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.489 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 | 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 | 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 | 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 | 2314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 3117 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA GeForce 840A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP107 | GM108 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 17 March 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 989 | 991 |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |